Ballot access for 3rd Congressional District Libertarian candidate Edward Martin has been challenged by Brad Cummings, the chairman of the Jefferson County Republican Party.
Martin submitted the requisite number of petition signatures to place his name on the ballot, but he is also a registered Republican – a status that may threaten his candidacy as a libertarian.
The challenge will go before a judge, who will consider its legal viability. The Libertarian Party, however, aims to contest the challenge.
"We've got a Supreme Court case, I've just got to find a lawyer," said Libertarian Party chair Ken Moellman.
According to Moellman, the case Tashijan v. Republican Party contains language that indicates it is unconstitutional for a state to bar a candidate for running for office on one party's ticket while being registered as another.
Moellman earlier said that if any Libertarian candidate in Kentucky would be challenged, it would be Martin, due to his registration.
Now, he argues the move by Cummings shows Republicans are insecure about their candidate in the 3rd District – former U.S. Rep. Anne Northup (R-Louisville).
"I guess the Republican chairman in Louisville is concerned that Anne Northup is not a strong enough candidate," said Moellman.
Northup is facing freshman incumbent U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Louisville) in a rematch of their 2006 race.
Updated: Cummings confirmed he did make the challenge against Martin.
"I am standing up for what all political entities support: free, fair, open and legal elections," said Cummings.
This week's Winners & Losers. | CLICK HERE >
Janet Napolitano, the Democratic governor of Arizona and an early supporter of Barack Obama's presidential campaign, is being mentioned for ... >
ballot access
We will have a decision by Monday.
I defended myself against a cadre of lawyers yesterday. We'll see if the Constitution trumps two party good ole boy politics.
Free, fair, open and legal?
Really? You have the gull to claim you're for free, fair, open and legal elections?
How many signatures did your candidate need again? How many did ours need?
Elections are anything but. And the Supreme Court trumps your law. At a minimum, this restriction is a violation of the US Constitution. With any luck, we'll get the same result that LP Ohio did. LPO successfully sued and Ohio's ballot access laws were all scrapped.
Post new comment